Proposed legislation on the classification of historical lands and buildings located within the Forest Preserve poses an acute threat to the Forest Preserve.

Proposed legislation (S.0495/Stec-A.2411/Jones) seeks to amend section 816 of article 27 of the Executive Law, the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) Act. Lands within the Adirondack Park owned by the State are Forest Preserve lands protected by under Article 14 of the New York State Constitution, the famed “Forever Wild” clause, which requires that the Forest Preserve “be forever kept as wild forest lands.”

Protect the Adirondacks opposes this legislation.

Forest Preserve lands in the Adirondack Park are classified and managed in accordance with the Adirondack Park StateLand Master Plan (“Master Plan”), which was first adopted by APA and approved by Governor Rockefeller in 1972. The Master Plan (page 12) was amended in 1979 to include provisions for Special Historic Areas “for the developmentand management of state historic sites.” The Master Plan has strict management guidelines for “state historic sites”,“properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places”, and for properties that are recommended for nomination to the historic register that “the state has committed resources to manage . . . primarily for historic objectives.” Because the Master Plan already has specific provisions for addressing sites and structures with historic significance or value, the proposed bill is redundant and unnecessary.

 

The old farm house on the Hudson River. This structure was retained by the NYSDEC as part of its purchase of the former Finch, Pruyn and Company lands, but no use could be organized for it and it was removed. Had this legislation been in place, these Forest Preserve lands would have been classified differently and this building would have remained as a drain on state resources.

A picture of the “farmhouse” that overlooks the Hudson River outside of Indian Lake, which was part of the Essex Chain Lakes purchase by the State of New York in 2012. The NYSDEC tried to find a use for this building but none could be identified and after many years this building was removed. Had this proposed legislation been in place these Forest Preserve lands would have had a different classification and this building would have been retained and a drain on state resources.

Additionally, the bill improvidently limits APA’s discretion under the Master Plan by directing that it “shall” consider listed or eligible lands and buildings “for an historical classification”. The Master Plan recognizes that lands in theAdirondack Park purchased by the State often contain existing structures and includes specific provisions to ensure that non-conforming structures are removed. By requiring that every parcel of land containing existing structures to be considered for historic status, the bill will cause needless delays in classifying and developing management plans for newly acquired Forest Preserve lands.

A picture of the Gooley Club on Third Lake of the Essex Chain of Lakes, south of Newcomb, which was part of the Essex Chain Lakes purchase by the State of New York in 2012. Had this proposed legislation been in place these Forest Preserve lands would have had a different classification and these building would have been retained and a drain on state resources.

Moreover, the new requirement will open the door for every existing structure on newly acquired lands to be claimed as“historic”—as has already happened in the case of decrepit hunting cabins and accessory structures and, most recently, the Debar Lodge and its surrounding buildings that are falling down (including the boathouse that collapsed).

Maintaining these types of structures degrades the “Forever Wild” Forest Preserve and creates a financial burden on the State for management and upkeep in perpetuity.

 

Debar Lodge above. The buildings on this site should be removed.

Early in 2024, the Town of Duane passed a resolution in opposition to an amendment to retain Debar Lodge and a number of dilapidated buildings around it. Legislation to enable a Constitutional Amendment for Debar Lodge was withdrawn. This legislation is an end-around and backdoor effort to try and retain Debar Lodge, which should be removed and the site rewilded.